RADIATION NATION

Health Sciences Institute e-Alert 

February 10, 2003 

*********************

Dear Reader, 

After sending you the e-Alert last week about irradiated beef 
("Don't Beam Me Up" 2/4/03), I came across a news item announcing that a popular supermarket chain began selling irradiated ground beef on February 2nd in six mid-Atlantic states, including Maryland, where I live. These stores are among some 4,000 nationwide that currently sell irradiated beef. 

This alone would be unsettling enough. But in response to that e-Alert, I received a reply from HSI Panelist Jon Barron with additional information about the irradiation process that I guarantee will make you think twice the next time you stop off at your grocery to buy meat products. 

--------------------------------------------------------------
Who let the nutrients out? 
--------------------------------------------------------------

To briefly recap: Irradiation is a process by which a food product is exposed to extremely high doses of radiation to kill bacteria, parasites and funguses that may cause spoilage or disease. And if that were all irradiation did, that would be fine. But as we'll see, there's much more to it than that. 

Jon begins by describing the process in more detail: "Food is exposed to 'hard' irradiation, usually gamma rays from a source like cobalt-80, in doses of 100,000 to 3,000,000 rads. To give you a sense of how high a dose this is, understand that a dose of just 10,000 rads will totally destroy any living tissue." 

As HSI Panelist Allan Spreen, M.D., made clear last week, an abundance of nutrients are also eliminated by this process. Jon agrees, and says, "as much as 70% of the Vitamin A, B1 and B2 in irradiated milk is destroyed, and about 30% of Vitamin C." Unfortunately, irradiation also accelerates the growth of aspergillus mold, "which produces the most potent natural carcinogens known to man, called aflatoxins." 

I wish I could say that's the worst of it - but we're just getting started. 

--------------------------------------------------------------
A radiotoxin by any other name... 
--------------------------------------------------------------

Processing food with the extremely high levels of gamma rays described above results in the creation of some very dangerous molecules, about which Jon gives this interesting but frightening background: "They were originally called 'radiotoxins' by Russian researchers. Since that word would be frightening to American consumers, the FDA came up with a couple of 'softer' terms. They call them 'known radiolytic products' to describe the molecules that are created such as formaldehyde and benzene (known carcinogens), and as for those chemical molecules created by irradiation and that have never before been seen by man, the FDA came up with the equally soft 'unique radiolytic products.'" 

Long before the FDA started assigning more palatable terms for these very unappetizing results, it had already reviewed more than 400 studies about the irradiation process. But Jon tells us where that review process fell woefully short: "They accepted 226 studies for further review. They then narrowed their criteria and selected only 69 for in-depth review. Of these, the FDA itself reported that 32 of the 69 showed adverse effects, and 37 showed safety problems. Then without explanation, they eliminated all but 5 of the 69 (including every negative study) and said they would base their decision on those 5 alone. 

"In the FDA's final report approving food radiation, they wrote that when up to 35% of the lab-animal diet was radiated, feeding studies had to be terminated because of premature mortality or morbidity." And in one test at the Medical College of Virginia, rats fed irradiated beef "died of hemorrhagic syndrome in 34 days." 

--------------------------------------------------------------
Running from the radura 
--------------------------------------------------------------

According to Jon, "Foods already approved for irradiation include: fruits, vegetables, wheat, flour, herbs, spices, nuts, seeds, peas, pork, and chicken." And to that we can add ground beef - now in a supermarket in my neighborhood, and very likely in yours as well. 

If you don't like the idea of irradiated food (and at this point I can't imagine how anyone possibly could), you can look for a symbol called the "radura" which is required on the packaging of irradiated foods. The radura is a green circle (broken into four segments at the top of the circle), enclosing a flower image represented by a large green dot with two petals below the dot. 

But even if you avoid products marked with the radura, you're still not in the clear. As Jon explains, "The FDA requires a label stating a food has been radiated if, and only if, it was radiated as a 'whole food' and then is sold unchanged. But, if you process it in any way, if you add any other ingredients to it, it no longer requires a label stating that it (or any of its ingredients) were irradiated. To put it simply, an irradiated orange would require a label; irradiated orange juice would not." 

--------------------------------------------------------------
An uncomfortable level of comfort 
--------------------------------------------------------------

But even if people see the radura on a package of ground beef, a bag of Brazil nuts, or a sticker on an apple - do they know what its significance is? And worse, do they have any idea of the risks? By and large, my guess is "no." In a report from Reuters last December, a survey conducted by the National Cattlemen's Beef Association found that almost half of Americans say they would feel comfortable purchasing irradiated meat. This response was 10 percent higher than it had been to the same question on a similar nationwide survey earlier in the year. 

In other words, people are apparently becoming comfortable with the idea of irradiated food. And it seems they'll have ample opportunity to buy it. SureBeam Corporation (the largest provider of irradiation technology in the U.S.) plans to process more than 300 million pounds of beef this year. Last year they processed only 15 million pounds. 

Feel free to forward this e-Alert to friends and relatives. Help us spread the word that this idea, whose time has apparently come, is not a good idea, although it looks like it's probably here to stay. So it may be the best that we can do to avoid irradiated foods by looking for the odd green flower. 

My thanks to Jon Barron for his exhaustive profile of this subject. Jon has researched and written extensively about alternative medicine, nutrition, and herbal remedies for almost thirty years. For more information about Jon and his work, visit his web site at jonbarron.com. 

...and another thing 

Using Viagra to treat one of the side effects of Prozac was the subject of an e-Alert I sent you last month ("Laugh Lines" 1/22/03). In response I received this personal recollection from an HSI member named Vicki: 

"I know that doctors have prescribed medicines to 'treat' side effects of previous medications for many years. When my Grandmother moved closer to her daughter, they went over the medicines that she was taking at the time. They discovered only 2 of the 10 or 12 prescriptions were for original problems. All the others were to treat the side effects of those 2! I can recall a large lazy-Susan devoted only to the salt, pepper and medicines that my grandparents took when I was a child. I'm willing to bet that many of those medicines were for treating side effects of the other prescriptions. That was 30 years ago. Just thought you'd like to know that this is not a new problem." 

I wonder how many lazy-Susans there are out there, filled to the edges with drugs that have been prescribed to treat the side effects of other pharmaceuticals? I'm afraid the answer is "too many." 

Another HSI member recently wrote with a question we receive with some frequency. This comes from L.D.E.: 

"How do you find the right doctor that combines conventional and alternative approaches? My cholesterol was above 300 this last June. But my Doctor didn't test me for any of the other different markers for heart disease identified in your newsletter. It seems it's time to change. I don't have the time to teach him." 

If your doctor isn't receptive to treatments involving vitamins, herbs, or other alternative methods that you may want to explore, you can locate physicians who are trained and knowledgeable about complementary medicine by contacting The American College for Advancement in Medicine, at their web site: acam.org. In fact, I'm visiting a new doctor I found through ACAM next week. 

To Your Good Health, 

Jenny Thompson Health Sciences Institute 

*****************

ELIMINATE PROSTATE PROBLEMS FOR GOOD 

Next poker night with the boys, remember this: Most of them are hiding something...prostate disease. 

One in every two men will suffer with prostate problems after age 50. And that number gets as high as 90% of men in their 
70s and 80s. But now you have the power to avoid their fate. At last there's a safe, natural alternative that can help you: 

* Shrink swelling and eliminate pain 
* Increase urinary flow - allowing a restful night's sleep 
* See dramatic improvement in as little as 28 days 

(Contact Dr. Eliezer Ben-Joseph For more information 1-915-833-0222) 

*****************

Sources: "U.S. Food Industry Begins to Embrace Irradiation" Jerry Bieszk, Reuters, 2/5/03

"Weis to Sell Irradiated Beef Through Pact With SureBeam" Dow Jones Business News, 1/29/03 

"Parents Protest U.S. Schools Irradiated Meat Plan" Randy Fabi, Reuters, 12/13/02 

"FDA Allowing Food Companies To Change Irradiation Label to 'Cold Pasteurization'" Reuters, 10/9/02 

Copyright (c)1997-2003 by www.hsibaltimore.com, L.L.C. The e-Alert may not be posted on commercial sites without written permission.

Copyright Issues?